Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Can you use INTOXICATION as a defence for murder? | R. v Sullivan & Chan

Can you use INTOXICATION as a defence for murder? | R. v Sullivan & Chan

Episode 124 Published 2 years, 2 months ago
Description
A few years ago Thomas Chan consumed magic mushrooms and went on to attack his father, arguing the defence of automatism in court: he wasn't responsible for his actions whilst under the influence. This, and the case of Sullivan, opened up a can of worms in Canadian law. 
Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us