Podcast Episode Details

Episode 10: Why did the Supreme Court smack down Trudeau's assessment act?

---

Episode 10

---

On Episode 10 of Not Reserving Judgment, we discuss how the Impact Assessment Act decision is a big win for Alberta; we explain why the Ontario legislature can censure MPP Sarah Jama despite her freedom of expression; and we update you on the travel ban challenge led by former Newfoundland Premier Brian Peckford and PPC Leader Maxime Bernier.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• Reference re Impact Assessment Act (Supreme Court of Canada)
• Sarah Jama's statement on Israel (X.com)
• Censure motion regarding Sarah Jama (OLA)
• New Brunswick Broadcasting Co. v. Nova Scotia (Speaker of the House) (SCC)
• Travel Vaccine Mandate Challengers in Court to Contest Previous Mootness Ruling (Epoch Times)
• CCF to appear in court TODAY in appeal of decision that found math test for teachers discriminatory (CCF)
• No, the Supreme Court ruling on federal environmental law is not good for business (Globe and Mail)
• Mélanie Jolie's post (X.com)
• François-Philippe Champagne's post (X.com)
• After Supreme Court’s decision, Ottawa must urgently refocus its climate policy (Globe and Mail)

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

---

Published on 2 years, 1 month ago