Episode Details
Back to Episodes
How to Deal With In-Laws: 3 Principles for a Stronger Marriage
Season 1
Episode 102
Published 10 years, 6 months ago
Description
The definition of mixed feelings: watching your mother-in-law drive off a cliff in your brand new car.
The joke lands because almost everyone has felt some version of it. The strain, the awkward visits, the loyalty conflict you cannot quite name. Knowing how to deal with in-laws is not a personality trait you either have or you don't. It is a structure you build with your spouse, and there are three principles that hold it up.
This is what we work on with couples in our practice. The arguments people bring in often look like specific in-law incidents. Underneath, the issue is almost always one of three things: the couple has not yet established themselves as a primary unit, one spouse is trying to manage the kin network alone, or the relationship needed grace it never received. Get those three right and most of the in-law tension settles. Get them wrong and even good in-laws feel like a problem.
Before we go further, two caveats. If you or your spouse has a parent with a personality disorder, an active addiction, or a pattern of contempt, the principles below still apply, but you will need to add a different layer on top. We address that in the toxic in-laws section near the end. And if you are caring for an aging parent in your home, the dynamics are different again, because caregiving stress would be present with anyone, never mind a parent. Take what fits and adapt the rest.
None of us have perfect in-laws. None of us will be perfect in-laws. We are speaking to the broader case of reasonably healthy, imperfect parents and the marriages they affect.
How In-Laws Influence Your Marriage
You may be wondering whether the friction with your in-laws actually matters to your marriage, or whether you are making something out of nothing. The research is consistent on this. It matters.
A study from 2001 looked at marital success and in-law relationships across nearly 300 wives and 300 husbands and found that the quality of the in-law relationship predicted the stability, satisfaction, and commitment expressed by spouses in the study. For wives, marital success was tied to the relationship with both the mother-in-law and father-in-law. For husbands, it tracked most strongly with their relationship to the father-in-law.[i]
That asymmetry is interesting. We do not know exactly why husbands' marital satisfaction was most closely associated with their fathers-in-law specifically, but the larger point is that what happens with your in-laws does not stay with your in-laws. It bleeds into your marriage in measurable ways. So when your spouse names tension with your parents, take the report seriously. Something important is being registered.
One more research finding worth sitting with. A 2000 study of newlyweds found that closeness to the husband's family predicted increased happiness for both spouses. Two years in, only the wife's closeness to her husband's family kept predicting marital happiness. The wives, in other words, were the gatekeepers of the kin network.[ii] That is a real finding with real implications, and we will come back to it in Principle 2.
Now, three principles for how to actually do this.
Principle 1: The Autonomy of Family Units
When two people marry, they form a new household that is structurally distinct from the two households they came from. Not isolated from them. Distinct from them. The marriage is the primary unit. The parents become an extended unit. Both relationships continue, but the priority changes.
This is older wisdom that modern attachment research has caught up to. A 2001 paper put it this way: "The new family has the task of forming a stronger, autonomous bond than the two from which the partners originated. If partners are unable to accomplish this task, their union may be threatened."[iii] Research from as far back as 1954 found that marriages were more cohesive when couples were autonomous and had little conflict with their parents.[iv] The point has been steady for a long time.
What we wan